The US Postal Services asks congress for another 1.4 Billion to pay retirement pensions that they owe. By the way, social security also says that they will be spending more that they take in by next year.
Obama says that his healthcare system will compete like the post office with the private companies. His hero F. D. Roosevelt brought us Social security knowing full well that it was a ponzie scheme. But who really cares, so long as the government keeps giving us stuff, that's the important thing: Vote Democrat to keep it coming!
Showing posts with label ponzie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ponzie. Show all posts
Friday, September 25, 2009
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Not Listening Still
Today BHO spokesperson Gibbs says town hall attendees are not indicative of America and the sentiments of the populace. They are indicative of my sentiments. Not only is this administration not listening to the people, they are trying to silence us via their propaganda machine. I do not want socialism and I do not know anyone who does. Some people may have wanted change but not this.
Medicare costs much more that predicted and budgeted. Tax payers have to pick-up the multi billion (or I suppose trillion) dollar bill. If this isn't failure, I do not know what is. By broadening the scope of government health care we can include more of the population and take in more money. This is ponzi finance: if Medicare needs money, we make more promises to provide more care to more people so we can get more money to catch up with medicare shortages. Who will pick-up the bill for the new programs? BHO does not care.
A Government-single-payer economic model does not work in health care or anything else. The bigger it gets, the worse it works. There is no shortage of economic and medical system experts who can explain in great depth why this is so. Supporters of the current proposals are not listening to objections. They prefer to continue to asset that there are no cogent arguments offered by opponents. I have listened to them but not only hear no cogent arguments in favor of their proposal but have not even heard exactly what their proposal is.
When do we try freedom is what I ask.
Medicare costs much more that predicted and budgeted. Tax payers have to pick-up the multi billion (or I suppose trillion) dollar bill. If this isn't failure, I do not know what is. By broadening the scope of government health care we can include more of the population and take in more money. This is ponzi finance: if Medicare needs money, we make more promises to provide more care to more people so we can get more money to catch up with medicare shortages. Who will pick-up the bill for the new programs? BHO does not care.
A Government-single-payer economic model does not work in health care or anything else. The bigger it gets, the worse it works. There is no shortage of economic and medical system experts who can explain in great depth why this is so. Supporters of the current proposals are not listening to objections. They prefer to continue to asset that there are no cogent arguments offered by opponents. I have listened to them but not only hear no cogent arguments in favor of their proposal but have not even heard exactly what their proposal is.
When do we try freedom is what I ask.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)